
By Emile Cormier
With feedback from members of the
Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, New Brunswick Centre.
This guide is intentionally vendor-neutral and does not recommend any specific brands or models.
Released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License - CC BY-NC-SA.
Version 1.1, 2021-11-01
A print-friendly PDF version can be downloaded here.

Contents
- Telescope Basics
- Common Optical Tube Types
- Common Mount Types
- Telescopes for under $1000 (CAD)
- Telescopes for over $1000 (CAD)
- Which Telescope Under $1000 is Right for Me?
- Which Telescope Over $1000 is Right for Me?
- Useful Upgrades and Accessories
- Gear for Taking Snapshots of the Moon
- Gear for Capturing Images of the Planets (and Close-ups of the Moon)
- Gear for Capturing Images of Deep Sky Objects
Telescope Basics

Aperture: Diameter of the objective lens or primary mirror
It is the main performance indicator of any telescope. More aperture means:
- More light gathering power.
- Faint objects (galaxies, nebulas) are brighter.
- More magnification possible to see finer details (limited by atmospheric conditions – see below).
- Narrower fields of view.
- A bulkier, heavier, and more costly instrument.
How much aperture? It depends on:
- Your budget.
- Your desired portability.
- Your desired performance.
- Your desired field of view range (wide vs. narrow).
Magnification: Ratio between apparent size and true size
Also called “power”. It is determined by the focal length of the telescope and the eyepiece that’s being used (eyepieces are interchangeable). It is fixed in most binoculars. Magnification is limited by one of two factors:
- The telescope’s aperture: ×50 per inch of aperture.
- The steadiness of the atmosphere (called seeing).
Atmospheric seeing depends on your climate and geography, but it generally limits useful magnification to around ×200 on most nights.
Common Optical Tube Types
Reflector (aka Newtonian)

- One looks through the side of the tube with this type, not the back.
- Quite affordable when bundled with a simple Dobsonian mount
- Less prone to dew than other types
- Requires occasional collimation (re-alignment of the mirrors)
- A laser collimator tool makes this quick and easy.
- Astronomy clubs can do this for free at their meetings.
Refractor

- Limited to smaller apertures (large ones are very expensive)
- Maintenance-free – no collimation required
- Achromatic refractors show discoloration of bright objects at high magnification (called chromatic aberration) – best used at low power.
- Apochromatic refractors show no discoloration but are more expensive – this is the most recommended refractor type for deep sky astrophotography.
- Makes a good portable “grab & go” telescope when paired with an altazimuth mount
- Mass-produced kits have flimsy mounts & lousy accessories. Best to purchase the mount & accessories separately. Seek recommendations from experienced observers.
- Also good for terrestrial and solar viewing with proper accessories
Schmidt-Cassegrain (aka SCT)

- Optical design combines lenses and mirrors
- More compact than a reflector of the same aperture, but also more expensive
- Usually bundled with a computerized mount in telescope kits
- Field of view is narrower than other types ‒ makes it difficult to obtain good deep sky imaging results. Choose an apochromatic refractor instead for deep sky imaging.
- Good for planetary/lunar imaging using specialized cameras and processing techniques
- Best compromise for both visual and imaging, but not particularly well-suited to wide-field deep sky imaging
Common Mount Types
Dobsonian
- Simple wooden box
- Simple left-right / up-down motions
- Always bundled with reflector optical tube
- Very cost-effective
- Not very portable
Altazimuth
- Simple left-right / up-down motions
- Folds down for compact transportation
- Some include slow-motion controls to aid in tracking objects
- Those bundled in telescope kits are usually inadequate ‒ better to buy components separately. Seek recommendations from experienced observers.
- A Dobsonian mount is cheaper for telescope apertures larger than 4 inches
German Equatorial
- Axes of rotation are relative to the celestial pole for better tracking
- Motions are not intuitive
- This is the mount type required for long-exposure deep sky astrophotography
- Requires polar alignment for accurate tracking in astrophotograhy
- Those bundled in cheap telescope kits are almost always inadequate.
- Does not pair well with reflector tubes for visual use ‒ eyepiece ends up in awkward positions
Telescopes for under $1000 (CAD)
Binoculars

Price: | < $250 |
Complexity: | Trivial |
Portable: | Extremely |
Field of& view: | Very wide |
Aperture: | 42 - 80mm |
- 10×50s are the max for handheld use; 8×42s are easier to hold steady.
- Powers above ×10 need tripod mount for stability
- Camera tripod can work, video and spotting scope tripods are better
- Need binocular mounting L-bracket (sold separately)
- Some people can’t merge left/right images. Borrow a good working pair if you’ve never tried.
- Lowest cost for observing the night skies
Tabletop Dobsonian (reflector)

Price: | Starts at $280 |
Complexity: | Simple |
Portable: | Very |
Field of view: | Very wide |
Aperture: | 4.5 - 5 inches |
- Requires table or stool – the sturdier the better
- Avoid spherical mirrors – only buy parabolic.
- Prefer closed tube models (or make a shroud).
- Makes a good “grab & go” scope
- Better than department store telescopes for those on a tight budget
Dobsonian-Mounted Reflector (aka Dobsonian)

Price: | Starts at $430 |
Complexity: | Simple |
Portable: | Not very |
Field of view: | Wide |
Aperture: | 6 - 10 inches |
- Most light gathering bang per buck
- Good for deep sky objects and planets
- Adjustable-height chair recommended
- 8” dobsonian is a good place to start.
Computerized Single-Arm Schmidt-Cassegrain

Price: | Starts at $670 |
Complexity: | Intermediate |
Portable: | Quite |
Field of view: | Narrower |
Aperture: | 4 - 8 inches |
- Mount head moves to track objects.
- Needs star alignment at every setup
- Good for planetary imaging (with specialized camera and processing techniques)
- Deep sky imaging possible with additional wedge, but results may be disappointing
- Balances portability with performance while featuring go-to capability
Telescopes for over $1000 (CAD)
Truss Tube Dobsonian

Price: | Starts at $1000 |
Complexity: | Fairly simple |
Portable: | Not very |
Field of view: | Wide |
Aperture: | 10 - 20 inches |
Needs power: | No |
Go-to: | No |
- More set-up time vs solid tube
- Needs collimation more often vs solid tube
- Shroud covering truss poles is recommended.
- More compact for travel vs solid tube
Push-To Dobsonian

Price: | Starts at $1250 |
Complexity: | Fairly simple |
Portable: | Not very |
Field of view: | Wide |
Aperture: | 8 - 14 inches |
Needs power: | 9-volt battery |
Go-to: | No |
- Guides user where to push tube to find objects
- No motors or gears that can fail
- Good for urban use where star-hopping is not possible
Go-To Dobsonian

Price: | Starts at $1500 |
Complexity: | Intermediate |
Portable: | Not very |
Field of view: | Wide |
Aperture: | 8 - 16 inches |
Needs power: | Yes |
Go-to: | Yes |
- Needs star alignment at every setup
- Good for planetary imaging
- No deep sky imaging
- Lowest cost go-to for medium aperture
Fork-Mount Schmidt-Cassegrain

Price: | Starts at $2600 |
Complexity: | Intermediate |
Portable: | Depends |
Field of view: | Narrower |
Aperture: | 8 - 16 inches |
Needs power: | Yes |
Go-to: | Yes |
- Needs star alignment at every setup
- Good for planetary imaging
- Deep sky imaging possible with additional wedge, but results may be disappointing
- Larger models are quite heavy.
- Cannot use other optical tubes with mount.
- Balances aperture, portability, and set-up time while providing go-to ability
Schmidt-Cassegrain on Equatorial Mount

Price: | Starts at $1800 |
Complexity: | Advanced |
Portable: | Somewhat |
Field of view: | Narrower |
Aperture: | 6 - 16 inches |
Needs power: | Yes |
Go-to: | Yes |
- Needs star alignment at every setup
- Needs polar alignment at every setup
- Good for planetary imaging
- Deep sky imaging possible, but challenging
- Can use other optical tubes with mount
- Best compromise for both visual/imaging
Apochromatic Refractor on
Equatorial Mount (for imaging)

Price: | At least $2000 |
Complexity: | Advanced |
Portable: | Quite |
Field of view: | Very wide |
Aperture: | 3 - 5 inches |
Needs power: | Yes |
Go-to: | Yes |
- Needs star alignment at every setup
- Needs polar alignment at every setup
- 80mm is a good place to start.
- Not enough aperture for planetary imaging
- Can use other optical tubes with mount
- Ideal for deep sky imaging – short focal length is more forgiving
Which Telescope Under $1000 is Right for Me?
Binoculars

I want:
✓ To spend less than $250.
✓ A portable grab & go instrument.
✓ A simple instrument.
✓ To find objects myself using charts.
✓ To learn the night sky before buying a telescope.
Tabletop Dobsonian

I want:
✓ To spend less than $400.
✓ A gift for my child (or myself).
✓ A portable grab & go instrument.
✓ A simple instrument.
✓ To find objects myself using charts.
Dobsonian-Mounted Reflector

I want:
✓ Lots of aperture for my money.
✓ To observe planets in detail.
✓ To observe faint deep sky objects.
✓ A simple instrument.
✓ To find objects myself using charts.
Computerized Single-Arm Schmidt-Cassegrain

I want:
✓ A tripod-mounted portable instrument.
✓ A compact optical tube with decent aperture.
✓ A fairly technical instrument.
✓ Go-to capability and tracking.
✓ To observe planets in detail.
✓ To observe faint deep sky objects.
Which Telescope Over $1000 is Right for Me?
Truss Tube Dobsonian

I want:
✓ Lots of aperture for my money.
✓ A simple visual instrument.
✓ To find objects myself using charts.
✓ A large dobsonian that breaks down into smaller pieces for transport.
Fork-Mount Schmidt-Cassegrain

I want:
✓ A fairly technical visual instrument.
✓ Go-to capability and tracking.
✓ A tripod and a compact optical tube.
✓ To take planetary images.
✓ More aperture and stability than a single-arm altazimuth mount.
Push-To Dobsonian

I want:
✓ Lots of aperture for my money.
✓ A simple visual instrument.
✓ Computerized assistance in finding objects.
✓ A way to find objects in light-polluted skies.
✓ A high-tech instrument without motors or gears than can break down.
Schmidt-Cassegrain on Equatorial Mount

I want:
✓ A very technical instrument.
✓ A mount for visual and imaging use.
✓ A compact optical tube for visual use.
✓ To spend more time setting up (or house it in an observatory).
✓ Go-to capability and tracking.
✓ To take planetary images.
✓ To dabble in deep sky imaging*.
Go-To Dobsonian

I want:
✓ Lots of aperture for my money.
✓ A fairly technical visual instrument.
✓ Go-to capability and tracking.
✓ To take planetary images.
Apochromatic Refractor On Equatorial Mount

I want:
✓ To take long-exposure deep sky images with results I can be proud of.
✓ A very technical instrument.
✓ A mount for visual and imaging use.
✓ To spend more time setting up (or house it in an observatory).
✓ Go-to capability and tracking.
Useful Upgrades and Accessories
Red Flashlight or Headlamp (essential)
- Preserves dark-adaptation
- Dimmable is better
- Those with lanyards to wear around your neck can free your hands.
- Can dim with layers of tape/paper
Star Charts and Atlases
- Essential for manual telescopes
- More reliable than mobile apps
- Some show Telrad reticles for bright objects (aka Telrad charts).
Reticle Finder
- Projects illuminated circles that measure angular distance.
- Used to find objects at known angular distance from stars.
- Telrad and Rigel Quikfinder are most common.
Laser Collimator (for reflector telescopes)
- Easiest way to realign reflector mirrors yourself
- Inserts into focuser drawtube (where eyepiece normally goes)
- Cheap ones are not always accurate.
Right-Angle Correcting Image (RACI) Finderscope
- Less magnified view than main optical tube – easier to find objects
- Right-angle allows comfortable viewing.
- Correcting image matches orientation of the object in the sky.
Wide Angle Eyepiece
- Useful for very wide objects
- “Spaceship porthole”-like experience
- Makes it easier to find objects before switching to higher power.
- Get recommendations for your specific telescope from experienced observers before buying.
Dew Shield (for Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes)
- Wraps around end of optical tube to make objective lens less exposed
- Prolongs time before front lens gets covered in dew
- Can be made at home with suitably flexible and rigid material
Dew Heaters
- Heated hook-and-loop straps that apply gentle heat
- Prevent lenses and mirrors from getting covered in dew
- Require a dew controller and power source
- Never wipe dew off optics!
Gear for Taking Snapshots of the Moon

Phone Adapter
The Moon is the only nighttime celestial object that’s bright and wide enough to be photographed as a single snapshot and produce satisfying results.
Just about any decent telescope will allow you to take snapshots of the moon.
A phone adapter makes it easier to hold up and aim a phone camera against a telescope eyepiece.

Camera Adapter
Prime focus astrophotography (without a camera lens) using a digital camera requires:
- A camera t-ring adapter.
- Possibly a t-thread extender (sometimes combined with the nosepiece) – needed to achieve the required backfocus distance on certain Newtonian or refractor telescopes.
- A t-thread nosepiece for Newtonian and refractor telescopes.
- A t-thread to SCT adapter for Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes.
There are camera adapter kits that combine the above. For Newtonian and refractor telescopes, make sure the nosepiece fits into your telescope’s focuser (1.25 inch or 2 inch barrel diameter).
Gear for Capturing Images of the Planets (and Close-ups of the Moon)

Due to turbulence in the atmosphere, still images of planets tend to be quite blurry.
Sharper details are achievable using a process called lucky imaging. This involves recording video of a planet through a telescope. The idea is to capture brief moments where the view is steady.
The ideal camera for this is a dedicated planetary imaging camera with a high-speed USB 3 output. It requires a portable computer to record the video data (ideally one equipped with a solid state drive). Good cameras cost over $200.
Specialized stacking software is required to process the best frames from the video and produce a still image. This image is then digitally sharpened to obtain a much clearer view of the planet than is possible with single snapshot.
A motorized telescope is pretty much required for this. The more aperture, the better.
Planetary imaging is not a casual endeavour! It’s not as simple as point and shoot.

Although less ideal, a smartphone mounted to the telescope via a phone adapter can also be used to record the video of a planet.
The phone’s video then needs to be converted to a format supported by stacking software.

A digital camera (DSLR or mirrorless) can also be used to record the planetary video (in movie mode). It’s not as ideal as a dedicated planetary imaging camera, but it can still allow you to try your hand at lucky imaging.
There are programs that can record the video from a digital camera tethered to a computer via USB.
Gear for Capturing Images of Deep Sky Objects
Prepare to spend several thousand for a minimal setup.
Much learning effort – not a casual endeavour!
Only a brief overview is provided here. This is a vast subject that cannot be adequately covered in this short guide.
Imaging deep sky objects (galaxies, nebulas, star clusters) involves taking minutes-long exposures using a telescope with good tracking. Hours worth of exposures are required, then need to be stacked using specialized software. This can be quite technical and is not a casual endeavour!
A short focal length refractor is the best way to start and achieve satisfying results. Avoid the temptation to use a large aperture instrument such as a Schmidt-Cassegrain – that way will most likely lead to frustration.
Mount options:
- German equatorial mount: best option for accurate tracking. Payload capacity should be twice the actual payload weight for mass-produced mounts.
- Fork mount with equatorial wedge: not recommended.
Main camera options (least to most expensive):
- Digital camera body (DSLR or mirrorless) with adapters
- Dedicated one-shot color (OSC) astronomy camera
- Dedicated monochrome astronomy camera with filter wheel. More efficient at gathering light and allows narrowband imaging.
If you don’t already own a digital camera (such as a DSLR), it’s better to start with a dedicated astronomy camera if you can afford it.
Auto-guiding is recommended for best results. A separate guide camera and special software is used to send corrections to the mount to keep an object centered.
Guider options (requires dedicated guide camera):
- Smaller guidescope mounted to the main scope.
- Off-axis guider (OAG) – uses part of main scope’s light.
A portable computer is necessary if using a dedicated astronomy camera, or for running autoguiding software.